Thank You for Smoking? Essay -- Peter Brimelow Tobacco Essays

Thank You for Smoking?Peter Brimelow brings to light an interesting idea in his essay Thank You for Smoking? Brimelows purpose of his essay is to counterbalance smoking. He provides the audience with information that is worthy of their consideration and valid enough to make them think twice well-nigh how they stand on the issue of smoking. Unfortunately, around flaws in Brimelows technique distract the audience from his message that smoking is not as unhealthy as it appears. A few mistakes transform his shape from a well-written argumentative essay to an unsuccessful attempt to spread his beliefs. What started as an essay to rouse new views on the issue of smoking swiftly at sea all merit and became a means to assail the people in opposition of the authors views. Brimelow makes a gallant effort to prove his study margin call, or main idea (McFadden). He wants to get the audience to concur with him that smoking is not an altogether unhealthy habit (Brimelow 141). However, mistakes in his essay stick with his major claim statement. When Brimelow writes that smoking might be, in some ways, good for you (141), he already puts doubts in the minds of the audience. Instead of feeling that the author is confident about his position on the subject, the audience picks up on the skepticism hidden in the words might and some small ways. Those qualifiers, or words and phrases that forefend some situations from his major claim (McFadden), leave the audience questioning who it is beneficial for and in what situations. Brimelow uses warrants, or peoples values (McFadden), to get them to coincide with his beliefs. Because Brimelows main claim is very disputable, he needs to find some way to catch the attention of the audience a... ... the mistakes he has made. When his audience looks back on the essay they read just read, his examples and facts about smoking that have been so keenly expressed will be unseen, because the focus will be on the unprofessional f allacies look in his work. In future works, it would be advantageous for Brimelow to be aware of these fallacies and to find a different means of approaching his rebuttal so that some other strenuous effort will not be diminished into an unsuccessful attempt to disperse his beliefs.Works CitedBrimelow, Peter. Thank You for Smoking? The genre of Argument. Ed. Irene L. Clark. Boston Thomson Heinle, 1998. 141-143.Clark, Irene L. The Genre of Argument. Boston Thomson Heinle, 1998.McFadden, James. Introduction to Toulmin Method. Lecture. Sept. 13 & 14, 2003. Buena Vista University. Storm Lake, IA.